Don't Let This Happen To You
The following are examples of problems
that can be avoided by obtaining the help of an estate
planning attorney. Do
not let these stories become your reality. Contact the
Kisner Law Firm today.
Wills Created During Second Marriages
Anita
and Francisco were 35 years old when they decided to get
married. Both of them had been previously married
and divorced and each had two children from their prior
marriage. Francisco had been living in an apartment before
he got married; he did not own a home. But Anita owned
a home and that is where Anita and Francisco chose to live
after getting married. Not long after getting married,
they each created their own will, in which each
left all of his/her assets to his/her spouse and if such
spouse was no longer alive, half of his/her assets
to one spouse’s children and the other half to
the other spouse’s children. For example, if Anita
died first, Francisco would inherit all of Anita’s
assets. Then, under their current wills, when Francisco
died, half of his assets, which then included the assets
inherited from Anita, would go to his children and the
other half to Anita’s children. Anita died
first and Francisco inherited all of Anita’s assets.
Francisco later created a new will that left all of his
assets to his own children. He did not include Anita’s
children in his will. Therefore when Francisco
died, his children inherited everything and Anita’s
children inherited nothing.
The unintended results of this scenario could have been
avoided had Anita and Francisco consulted with an estate
planning attorney. An estate planning attorney would have
advised the couple to create a revocable living trust that
provided the following: on the death of the first spouse
that dies, all of that spouse’s property would go
automatically into an irrevocable trust for the surviving
spouse’s benefit but that on the survivor’s
death all of the assets of the irrevocable trust would
go to the first deceased spouse’s children. Because
such a trust is irrevocable, it could not be changed by
Francisco after Anita’s death. This would have ensured
that Anita’s children would inherit their mother’s
estate upon Francisco’s death and that Francisco
would be able to live in Anita’s house until he died.
Providing for Disabled Children
Michael and Linda had just celebrated their
30th wedding anniversary when they were killed in a
car accident. They left behind two adult children, Daniel
and Rebecca. Daniel was disabled at birth and is currently
receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medi-Cal
(Medicaid) benefits. SSI and Medi-Cal are government
programs that help only those who have very limited
income and resources. Michael and Linda died without
a will. Following the laws of intestate succession,
a probate court divided Michael and Linda’s estate
in the following way: Half of the estate to Daniel and
the other half to Rebecca. Daniel’s inheritance
disqualified him from receiving further SSI and Medi-Cal
benefits because his inheritance put him above the income/resource
levels that he must stay below in order to continue
receiving government benefits. Daniel therefore had
to spend down his inherited assets back to the poverty
level so that he could reapply for the SSI and Medi-Cal
benefits he had been receiving.
Daniel’s
disqualification from SSI and Medi-Cal could have been
avoided. An estate planning attorney would have advised
Michael and Linda to create a revocable living trust
that would also create a “special needs trust”
for Daniel. The special needs trust could have named
Rebecca as the trustee. This would have allowed Rebecca
to pay for Daniel’s needs that were not covered
by the government benefit programs by using the principal/income
of the trust. The special needs trust also could have
provided that if Daniel died before Rebecca, the remainder
of the trust’s principal would go to Rebecca or
to Rebecca’s children. The creation of a special
needs trust would have been recommended by an estate
planning attorney. Had Michael and Linda obtained
such advice, Daniel would not have been disqualified
from receiving government benefits and the family’s
estate would have been preserved for Michael and Linda’s
heirs.
Creating Estate Planning Documents on
Your Own
Jamal and Vanessa have been married for many years
and have acquired a significant net worth. Jamal discovered
that he could save hundreds of thousands of dollars by
creating certain estate
planning documents that avoid probate
and eliminate or reduce estate taxes. Having been well
educated, he decided to save legal fees and prepare his
own estate planning documents. He purchased a “home-lawyer” software
package where he obtained a trust form that he filled out
and signed. The trust form provided that upon the death
of the first spouse to die, the entire combined estate
would be divided equally into a revocable survivor’s
trust and an irrevocable decedent’s trust or “bypass” trust.
Jamal died in his late 60’s. After his death, Vanessa
consulted with an estate planning attorney who advised
her that the trust form Jamal used was applicable only
to small estates. The attorney also advised her that the ½ of
Jamal and Vanessa’s estate that went into the irrevocable
decedent’s trust was more than the federal estate
tax applicable exclusion amount and that over funding the
decedent’s trust would cause an immediate estate
tax liability of over $100,000 dollars.
The unintended consequence of Jamal’s
actions could have been avoided by seeking the help of
an estate planning attorney before Jamal died. Jamal could
have taken the documents he created to an estate planning
attorney who would have reviewed them and informed Jamal
of the consequences of such documents. An estate planning
attorney would also have been able to recommend a different
estate plan for Jamal that better met his goals of avoiding
probate and reducing estate taxes. The money that Jamal
would have spent on a consultation with an estate planning
attorney would have been insignificant compared to the
$100,000 that his wife lost to estate taxes as a result
of creating estate planning documents on his own.
Serving Fremont, Newark, Union City
and Hayward, California
Disclaimer: The content
of this website has been created by Kisner Law Firm for
general informational and advertising purposes only. No
attorney-client relationship is established between Kisner
Law Firm and any reader who views the contents of this
website. The information provided is only a general statement
of the laws and regulations of California and is not intended
to be, nor does it constitute, legal advice. No one should
rely on the information provided by this website without
first obtaining legal advice from an attorney in their
jurisdiction.
|